Browse Category by Blog
Blog, People help People

People help People – in London

Close to the well-known Liverpool Street Station is a small Cafe, one of thousands in London

Nothing that special about this cafe but it is noteworthy that the food is good and the prices reasonable. 

The truly great thing about this Cafe is … the owner, called "Serhan". 

While sitting there enjoying my breakfast and tea, looking onto the streets, a homeless guy came by and stood still by the Cafe Window, looking inside the Cafe. I wasn't sure if he is looking to me, or someone else. I could not continue with my breakfast, turned around, and ask the owner if he knew this guy. He said "yes". 

Not knowing anything at all, I ask him if I should get this guy a tea or something, and Serhan (sorry if I spell your name incorrectly) replied "it is already in the making". 

"His food is being prepared, and coffee, too".

I asked Serhan if I could pay for this and he replied" no, don't worry, I have been doing this everyday for the past 8 years"

This Coffee Shop owner has served a hot meal and a coffee everyday, for the past eight years !!! to a homeless man. 

Serhan would not accept money from me, and had a gentle smile on his face. 

Humbled by this all I could offer to add to the coffee was a small wrapped German cookie that I still had in my pocket, to go with the coffee. 

Unnoticed by media and the world this owner is a true hero. He is doing what we all should be doing, helping and sharing. 

I am humbled and I ask of you: should you ever be in that area, please do visit the coffee shop and take your tea or lunch there. 

 

105 Worship St, London EC2A 2DG, Vereinigtes Königreich

+44 20 7539 9442

Share the Love, and thank you Serhan !

 

 

Blog, World History

For the British Prime Minister and Principle Parties


By Anna Von Reitz
 

These items are a simple communication presented to the British Prime Minister by the lawful government of the United States.  We consider the British Government responsible for much of the harm that has been done — responsible, though in the current generation, not to blame.  We would like:
1.      Permanent cessation of any Territorial, Municipal, or Regional “citizenship” obligations being presumed upon the American people who are not by birth or actual occupation naturally subject to these foreign political statuses;
2.      The establishment of a non-invasive means of identifying American state nationals to distinguish between them and United States citizens at a glance, to expedite issuance of proper passports and travel IDs and also allowing for efficient administration of applicable law;  
3.      The end of registration and conscription of American state nationals into federal pension plans, e.g., “Social Security”, health insurance plans, and other corporate enrichment schemes executed under color of law as government mandates when in fact such mandates do not apply to them;
4.      The end of legal prosecution of American state nationals as presumed federal citizens and their unlawful incarceration and harassment under these false pretenses;
5.      The  end of personage and press-ganging used against American state nationals by members of the Bar Associations acting as Undeclared Foreign Agents and unlicensed privateers;
6.      The reform of federal government accounting and reporting practices to guarantee transparency;
7.       The reform of commercial banking law to prevent acquisition of state bank and government agency names, trademarks, and copyrights so as to confuse the actual nature of the parties involved in transactions and also to prohibit the combining of commercial and investment banks;
8.      The vacating and/or voluntary sharing of our state and local public facilities as local need dictates; 
9.      The release of American political prisoners and others who have been convicted of non-violent victimless crimes, regulatory infractions, and failure to comply with implied contracts which do not exist under American Common Law;
10.   A Declaration of Lasting Peace ending any and all “war” or “emergency” related to the American states and people or purporting any controversy on our shores or within our states;
11.   The concurrent end of any presumption of “enemy” status attaching to American state nationals at home or abroad;
12.   The honoring of the obligations of the British Monarch and Holy See and Westminster to protect all Americans engaged in peaceful international trade;
13.   The recognition of our lawful pre-1860 civil peace flag of the Republic as our international ensign and flag now flying, characterized by its red and white vertical stripes and blue stars set against a white left corner block;
14.   The recognition of the American Silver Dollar and certificates based on silver as our traditional and lawful form of money;
15.   The recognition of the American Common Law as the law form owed to our states and people;
16.   The return of our land patents absent any false claims of abandonment, neglect, or voluntary release;
17.   The return of all titles, patents, trademarks, and copyrights taken to American assets, including our given names and estates;
18.   The return of unlawfully converted American fungible assets –public and private business, bank, retirement, escrow, and estate accounts– to their rightful owners;
19.   The reform of the Internal Revenue Service(s) to properly re-venue all assets public and private per Items 12, 13, and 14 above;
20.   The end of media manipulation, monopolization, black-outs, gag orders and spying without probable cause;
21.   The de-militarization of all police and federal agencies to expedite peace time functions;
22.   The re-tasking of the FBI to investigate and prosecute interstate bank fraud, interstate securities fraud, copyright and patent infringement, and human trafficking;
23.   Recognition of our land jurisdiction County Sheriffs and our Federal Marshals who serve the international land jurisdiction under the un-delegated reserved powers of the states;
24.   A moratorium on new non-essential legislation and a mandatory review process to correct former legislation so as to expedite implementation of these remedies and reforms;
25.   The end of all efforts, practices, and directives seeking to confuse, deceive, or defraud anyone;
26.   The establishment of a truly equitable credit-based monetary and financial system that reflects abundance and which properly values the abilities, resources, and labor of all people. 
 
Most of all, we would like the sincere and solemn commitment of the British Government and all Principle Parties to fully support the complete restoration and success of our lawful government.  We feel that the long and uncompensated labors of our people, the use and often the abuse of our resources, and the overall criminal nature of the methods and means that have been employed against us merit your complete understanding. 
Blog, World History

Letter to the Hague Prosecutor’s Office


By Anna Von Reitz

18th of April

Information and Evidence Unit

Office of the Prosecutor

P.O. Box 19519

2500 CM The Hague

The Netherlands

 

Dear Sirs:

We are facing a crisis in the long process to restore lawful government to the actual United States and continue to suffer false claims and insupportable, outlawed practices which the so-called Territorial United States and Municipal United States corporations have been attempting to foist off on the actual states and people.  

On May 1, 2017, they propose to set up a deliberate fraud scheme to attack and defraud millions upon millions of innocent people utilizing the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico as a base of operations.   This has been done before as part of the fraudulent 1930’s bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc., and is apparently being done in preparation for a similar fraud scheme related to the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES, INC.  The scheme has been prepared for by the Obama Administration and is apparently being carried through by the Trump Administration.  

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a member of the Territorial United States organization, is bankrupting its primary electrical utility corporation.  This in itself is hardly worthy of mention on a global scale and would occasion little comment or concern, except that Mr. Obama created millions of purported “franchises” which are supposedly stand as sureties for this particular Puerto Rican public utility.  

These “franchises” are all identified using alphabetic ACCOUNT designators that appear to be the names of living Americans— for example, Alfred T. Krebs or ALFRED T. KREBS.  It isn’t certain yet whether they will attempt to use Glossa against our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation issued last May or not, but their intention has been clearly stated in the press.   A copy of the Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation has been included in a letter (copy also attached) to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions. 

When unsuspecting Americans receive bills addressed to these foreign public transmitting utilities, they pay them under the false assumption that these bills are legitimately addressed to them.  The actual bills are already being paid out of the U.S. Treasury, so the perpetrators pocket the difference and say that these additional payments are “donations” and “gifts”—-but are really the fruits of unjust enrichment, extortion, racketeering, and fraud committed by employees against their trusting employers. 

It is international mail fraud, international identity theft, and involuntary conscription amounting to international slavery and racketeering being implemented via similar names deceits and the illegal and prohibited use of Glossas and false names.   Please note that these Accounts/ACCOUNTS which use middle initials are not even legal names for lack of specificity.

This is also constructive fraud on a massive scale which has been prepared with malice aforethought by foreign governmental services corporations operating as crime syndicates on our shores.  The essence of the crime is clearly established.  They kidnap, press-gang, and coerce Americans to sign up for programs that only US Territorial or US Municipal employees are eligible for, then falsely claim that these people are “voluntarily” functioning as either Territorial or Municipal “citizens” and are then subject to their private corporation statutes, regulations, and codes.  

Mr. Jeffrey Sessions, functioning as the U.S. Attorney General, has been given full warning with regard these deliberate anticipated crimes on our shores as well as a copy of our Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation which was also sent to you last May. 

                                                                 Sincerely, 

                                                                 Judge Anna Maria Riezinger 

 

cc: Letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions (two pages) 

 

Copy of Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation/May 31 2016 (two pages) 

 

Blog

Public Notice Provided to All Federal Employees and Agency Personnel Including IRS/Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Personnel:

By Anna von Reitz

Social Security Numbers can only be issued to federal "employees" / "citizens" for use only in the performance of their official duties.  See 20 CFR §422.104.  SSN’s used as TIN’s apply to the same Persons/PERSONS.
 
That is, only federal Persons (Territorials) or PERSONS (Municipals) can be issued Social Security Account Numbers/TIN’s and that is the way it has always been, except……. 
 
FDR and the Federal WWII Era Congress got around this and included millions of patriotic Americans by conscripting “volunteers” who agreed to pay federal income taxes as a “Victory Tax”. They did this by arbitrarily defining such voluntary taxpayers as Withholding Agents— Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines. 
 
The Victory Tax was supposed to sunset upon the “cessation of hostilities”, however, in September of 1945, Congress conveniently forgot to put a specific end date on this arrangement and the Internal Revenue Service continued to collect –thus changing this from a voluntary arrangement to help win the war– to an international extortion racket.  
 
This is your reminder that the Second World War hostilities ended in September of 1945. 
 
Any American “volunteer” who isn’t actually and naturally eligible for Social Security and who wishes to “retire” from the presumption of federal service and who revokes their election to pay federal taxes must be immediately set free and permanently released from any obligation to report, to pay, or accept responsibility for any federal Person/PERSON, and cannot otherwise be encumbered, imposed upon, or subjected by any agency or department of the federal territorial or municipal government (s). 
 
Compulsory “citizenship” does not exist.   
 
Those who have “retired” after becoming vested in the Social Security System as a result of this abuse are owed all their money back and/or all services promised at the time of their enrollment with no presumption of continued federal citizenship or its obligations attaching to them.   
 
The continued issuance of Social Security Numbers to people who aren’t actually federal employees and either United States Citizens or citizens of the United States is illegal entrapment under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit; it results in mischaracterization of political status, involuntary servitude,  identity theft, unlawful conversion of assets and other evils of racketeering committed against Americans who have been deliberately misinformed and told that they have to enroll in Social Security as a requirement of having a job—-any job.  
 
Enrollment in Social Security is only required if they happen to be seeking direct employment with the federal government or are otherwise legitimately considered federal government dependents—verifiable political asylum seekers, etc. 
 
Those born in one of the actual states of the Union who retire from such employment, including military employment, or who, owing no natural allegiance to the Territorial or Municipal governments, and having never been employed by the federal government(s), simply realize these facts and revoke their “election” to pay federal income taxes and cease thereafter to function as voluntary Withholding Agents must be set free from the presumption of any further territorial or municipal obligation. 
 
A similar entrapment occurs when American State Citizens are encouraged to vote in federal and federated state/county elections.  When they “register” to vote, they unknowingly give up their rights as stockholders and electors — an undisclosed loss — and they become “enfranchised” as presumed operators of federal corporation franchises.  This sleight-of-hand conversion of Americans from electors into mere voters again serves to mischaracterize them and defraud them and subject them and deprive them of their natural birth right and material interests at the hands of people who are in fact their employees.
 
As none of these losses and obligations are ever fully disclosed no valid private contract can be alleged and any American who subsequently rescinds a voter registration must be removed from all registration data bases and held harmless from any presumption of federal enfranchisement. 
 
Let’s just use this one small example of the Big Lie federal employees have been told and that they have been enforcing upon others…..continuing from (1) quoting from Christopher Chapman now:
 
“§ 422.104. Who can be assigned a social security number.
(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107 and you are:
(1) A United States citizen; or
(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States….
 
Let’s examine the definition of United States (U.S.) used in Title 26 to see if average Americans who are not employed by the federal government are a citizens of the U.S….. 
 
In most statutes (statute law) the Unites States referred to is federal territory, just as it is in Title 26—- i.e.:
 
26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions
(9) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia.
(10) State —-The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
 
The term “State” exposes the truth that term “United States” means the District of Columbia and no other.  
 
Let us review, specifically the history of the evolution of this term
 
The code of Federal Regulation is very definitive by using the word “its”, in lieu of, “their”
 
 Title 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part:
(1) Section 1 of the [Internal Revenue] Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States ….
(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the United States and subject and subject to its [District of Columbia] jurisdiction is a citizen.
 
The 1939 Code through 1954 the definition of “State”:
 
IRC 1954:
Alaska is a U.S. Territory
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territories and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.
Alaska joins the Union, strikeout “Territories” and substitute “Territory of Hawaii”:
 
Revision 1:
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territory of Hawaii and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.
 
Hawaii joins the Union, strikeout “the Territory of Hawaii and” immediately after the word “include”:
 
Revision 2
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a State of the Union
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
Notice how Alaska and Hawaii only fit these definitions of [Territorial] “State” before they were declared to be States of the United States of America, and now are hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever.[emphasis added]
 
Let’s examine some court cases that further solidifies this subject:
  
Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
 
A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions.  The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power  of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States. [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)] [bold emphasis added]
 
It is true, every person, and every class and description of  persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights and privileges guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members of the several state communities, or who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise, become members, according to the provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded. [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)]  [emphasis added]
 
… [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word “Citizen” is used in the federal Constitution, “Citizen of each State,” and “Citizen of the United States***,” are convertible terms; they mean the same thing; for “the Citizens of each State are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States,” and “Citizens of the United States***” are, of course, Citizens of all the United States***. [44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting][italics in original, underlines & C’s added]
 
 As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the Conventions of nine States that established and created the United States***, it is obvious there could not then have existed any person who had been seven years a citizen of the United States***, or who possessed the Presidential qualifications of being thirty-five years of age, a natural born citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United States***. The United States*** in these provisions, means the States united. To be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen of one of the States which ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative. To be a natural borncitizen of one of the States which shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States, are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870)] [bold and underline emphasis added]
 
 
After the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
 
It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States** and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual. [Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36]   [(1873) emphasis added]
 
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the State in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state. [Cory et al. v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327][(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
 
 
We have in our political system a Government of the United States** and a government of each of the several States.Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own ….[U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542] [(1875) emphasis added]
 
 
One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443. [McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323][(1883) underlines added]
 
 
A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States**. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, — the right to declare who are its citizens.[State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380]
[6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]
 
 
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the state in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state.
[4 Dec. Dig. ’06, p. 1197, sec. 11]
[“Citizens” (1906), emphasis added]
 
 
There are, then, under our republican form of government,two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person.[Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155]
[48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]
 
 
There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.
[Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
 
 
A person may be a citizen of the United States** and yet be not identified or identifiable as a citizen of any particular state.[Du Vernay v. Ledbetter] [61 So.2d 573, emphasis added]
 
 
… citizens of the District of Columbia were not granted the privilege of litigating in the federal courts on the ground of diversity of citizenship. Possibly no better reason for this fact exists than such citizens were not thought of when the judiciary article [III] of the federal Constitution was drafted.  … citizens of the United States** … were also not thought of; but in any event a citizen of the United States**, who is not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the [federal] Constitution.[Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914]  [emphasis added]
 
 
That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country. [Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)]
 
 
No fortifying authority is necessary to sustain the proposition that in the United States a double citizenship exists. A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of the State in which he resides.  Determination of what is qualified residence within a State is not here necessary. Suffice it to say that one possessing such double citizenship owes allegiance and is entitled to protection from each sovereign to whose jurisdiction he is subject.  [Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp. 383 (USDC/WDMO 1953)]
 
 
The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873).  Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship. 
[Jones v. Temmer, 829 F.Supp. 1226 (USDC/DCO 1993)]”  unquote Christopher Chapman.
 
In conclusion…. 
 
Attacking Americans who are not obligated in any way to pay federal income taxes, and certainly not obligated to pay “municipal” taxes merely disguised more generally as “federal” taxes, is against the law, both statutory and Public.  Coercing exempt persons and/or denying their claim of exemption is a criminal act of extortionate racketeering and inland piracy.
There are American state nationals (people who live as non-federal, non-citizens) and American State Citizens (who occupy public offices of the land jurisdiction states).  These are distinctly different groups within one Body Politic which is foreign to the “United States” as defined in Title 26 and throughout Federal Code. 
 
None of them are naturally liable to pay federal income taxes and none of them are subject to territorial or municipal law.  The sooner IRS employees become fully acquainted with these facts and the limitations of their powers and jurisdictions with respect to these Americans, the better for everyone involved. 
 
These facts are unwritten by the most fundamental principles giving rise to the government of this country.  Please note the following: 
 
The limited and exclusive power of legislation conferred on the Congress and the geographic authority of these powers is summed up by these controlling sections of the actual Constitution:
 
  • “power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
  • “power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
  • “constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of ‘Rules and Regulations,’ id., ‘respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States,’ id., i.e., federal territories and enclaves.
 
Please note that the Constitution confers upon Congress no power of territorial legislation over any person or property anywhere in the Union.  
 
Unless a person is naturally and/or truly voluntarily subject to the Territorial “United States” defined as the District of Columbia in Title 26, they cannot be subjected as a Municipal citizen, either; and Congress has no delegated legislative power allowing it to usurp its territorial or municipal authority upon the actual states and people otherwise. 
 
Read that as—-no means no.  There’s a difference between consensual sex and rape. 
 
When people born on the land of one of the actual organic states claim their non-territorial, non-municipal, non-citizen political status and give evidence of the same intention by issuing an Act of Expatriation from the presumption of Territorial citizenship, and the surrender of the Municipal PERSON issued to them back to the Secretary of the Treasury, and otherwise give Notice of their revocation of election to pay federal income taxes or to otherwise subject themselves and their assets to any territorial or municipal code, that decision must be respected and adhered to by all agents of the territorial and municipal government without question or exception. 
 
You can tax actual federal territorial and municipal employees all you like.  You can tax political asylum seekers and immigrants. You can tax people who are knowingly and voluntarily officers and employees of federally chartered corporations. 
 
What you cannot do is to blindly assume that the existence of a Social Security Number and Masterfile Account establishes any valid basis for presuming (1) the political status of any individual or (2) any basis for assuming and assessing federal tax liabilities or other merely presumed obligations.  
 
This circumstance is the result of self-interested mismanagement of federal agencies and departments for several generations.  It derives from wholesale distribution of Social Security Numbers and accounts by the Social Security Administration without respect for the limitations imposed by the actual law and without full disclosure to applicants.  It derives from purposeful efforts of the Congress to receive income from Americans under false pretenses—the presumption that they are knowingly and willingly acting as “volunteer” Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service.  Most of all, it results from widespread ignorance among Revenue Agents, federal program administrators, and the general public.  
 
All federal employees, all federal Territorial and Municipal citizens, all federal program administrators and managers need to be fully cognizant of these facts and you are encouraged to share them with your staff, your domestic judicial officers, your family and your friends.  
 
Federal service is meant to be an honorable occupation worthy of respect and support, but when it devolves to purposeful racketeering against the people this same service is meant to serve, prosecution and conflict is the inevitable result.  
 
It is important for federal employees –especially revenue agents and federal territorial and municipal judicial officers— to realize that when they misapply the law and contribute to these self-interested confusions they are committing serious crimes of racketeering, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, personage, and barratry against their employers and benefactors.  These international crimes against Americans have been promoted by the federal governmental services corporations under a pretense of war and wartime necessity.  It is therefore necessary to also address this claim. 
 
The Territorial aka “Federal” Government was created in 1868 in the wake of what is misleadingly called the “American Civil War” upon the release of the so-called Federal Constitution. This document, the “Constitution of the United States of America” presents articles of incorporation for a corporation doing business as the “United States of America” cleverly disguised via similar names deceit to resemble the actual Constitution. 
 
Please note that the actual constitution is: “The Constitution for the united States of America”, not “the Constitution of the United States of America”.  And both these documents are different from the municipal constitution called the “Constitution of the United States”. 
 
This conflict, the so-called “Civil War” was in fact an illegal commercial mercenary conflict taking place on our shores.  It was never declared by any action of the united States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never resolved by any peace treaty.  Instead, President Johnson declared peace on the land jurisdiction via three public declarations creating a binding contract mandating peace—once again underscoring the fact that this was a commercial mercenary action and no form of actual “war” at all.  
 
Ever since then there has been no sovereign government invoked and no competent land jurisdiction Congress of the actual states of the Union has been convened.  As a result, all so-called “wars” have instead been commercial mercenary actions carried out by corporations and/or internal domestic police actions.    
 
Read that as: Congress has no “war powers”.  “War” has specific requirements and definitions under international law, and twist and turn as they might, the members of Congress— as that body has operated since 1860 —cannot declare actual war or take refuge in any claim of war powers or any doctrine of necessity with respect to the actual states and people of the Union.  What began as a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action remains a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action subject to prosecution as fraud.  
 
It should surprise nobody that the actions of Congress seeking to enrich itself and to usurp against the lawful government of the actual United States by bolstering its territorial hegemony and deceptively terming it the [territorial] “United States” as seen in Title 26, is conceived in fraud and word-smithing and similar names deceits going back six generations.  
 
All Territorial (States of States) and Municipal (STATES OF STATES) are merely franchises of self-interested federal commercial corporations.  They have no vested authority related to the American states and people and have fraudulently usurped upon the jurisdiction and property assets of their employers. 
 
Without the ability to engage in actual war these various commercial corporations have rampaged around under false pretenses and have criminally trespassed on the Americans they are supposed to provide with “essential government services”.  They have also caused a great deal of trouble throughout the rest of the world.  
 
As federal employees and as citizens of the Territorial and Municipal “United States” it is very important for you to become fully aware of the limitations of your position of limited delegated authority and the substantially unfavorable circumstances created by these past actions, events, and public policies espoused by these various incorporated entities.  
 
You should also know that there is no “state” immunity available to invoke as protection against your actions as employees of commercial corporations and in most cases, your offices are not properly insured or bonded.  The sovereign government of this country is vested entirely in the American people and their jural assemblies at both the county and state levels.  Their states are the only ones enjoying sovereign immunity.  
 
This Public Notice is provided in the interest of avoiding unnecessary conflicts between Americans and their federal employees.
 
All legal presumptions regarding political status based on the existence of Social Security Numbers and Masterfile Accounts are being based on insupportable evidences obtained under conditions of non-disclosure and semantic deceit and implemented via the purposeful World War II Victory Tax circumvention of the actual law pertaining to the issuance of Social Security Numbers. 
 
Such presumptions of federal territorial or federal municipal citizenship cannot be maintained in the face of direct objection and reasonable proof of revocation by American state nationals and American State Citizens. 
 
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents
 
The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
                                                             Anchorage, Alaska 99508
Blog, World History

Public Notice to the United States/UNITED STATES


By Anna Von Reitz
 

We, the American states and people, are not dead, not slaves, and not donating our estates, our names, our copyrights, our land, or anything else to you and your corporations.  We are not standing as sureties for the debts of the United States (Territorial United States) nor the UNITED STATES (Municipal United States) and we are giving full, fair, and public Notice of the facts.  

 

We are disgusted by and estranged from the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States and the members of Congress representing these foreign entities which have encroached and usurped upon us by means of fraud, hypothecation of debt, and unlawful conversion of assets. 

 

With respect to us and as commercial corporations the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have no sovereignty, no immunity, no delegated authorization to seize upon the American states nor the American people nor any asset rightfully belonging to us.  

 

The Territorial United States and the Municipal United States must cease and desist all presumptions against the American states and people and must observe and obey the limitations stated in the contracts and treaties allowing your existence on our shores.  

 

Failure to respect our paramount claim to our lives, souls, bodies, land, names, copyrights, trademarks, all other intellectual property and  material rights, free will and all else that rightfully and naturally belongs to us, will result in the international liquidation of your corporations, the removal of your officials from our shores, and the international prosecution of the offenders. 

 

The United States of America and all member land jurisdiction states are alive and well.  The people of this country have reclaimed the land jurisdiction and returned to their native domicile on the land.  This is your Notice that we have done so and that we first made this announcement and these claims in 1998. 

 

We are posting this Public Notice via email on Bulletin Boards, Blogs, Chat Rooms, News Services, and Cyber Publications worldwide.  

Source: http://www.annavonreitz.com

Blog, People help People, Tibet

Please help – nun run over by car and left in the ditch

The Tibetan nun Tenzin Yingsel was walking down the mountain to Dharamsala/ North India, when she was run over by a hit-and-run car, and left in the ditch. 

   

On 14th of December, 2016 the nun walks to Dharamsala, to get a bus to attend the Kalachakra Buddhist Teachings with H.H. Dalai Lama in Bodhgaya. On the way to Dharamsala she was hit by a car and was left lying in the ditch. Both feet have severe injuries. So far, Ane Tenzin Yingsel had 6 operations – further operations can not be ruled out.

The hospital costs so far amount to 600,000 Indian rupees (about 7,200 GBP). To date, approximately 200,000 Indian rupees (about 2,400 GBP) have been donated.

PLEASE donate even a small amount – every little helps – literally !

 

Please send donations to the following PAYPAL account : tibetan_altruistic_trust@hotmail.com

Ane Tenzin Yingsel was born 1953 in Tibet. Her parents died when she was still a child. She became a nun, and escaped from Tibet to India in 1987. Since then, she lives in a small Indian village near Dharamsala.

Ane Tenzin Yingsel has no relatives – not in Tibet, nor in India.

 

 

CAUTION : The following photos can be distressing 

Blog, Unsere Gesundheit

Lesen in der AKASHA Chronik, oder doch Channeling?

Viele Menschen zeigen grosses Interesse an den sogenannten AKASHA Chroniken. Diese Chroniken, davon kann man ausgehen, existieren tatsächlich und sind auch zugäglich. 

Allerdings its es angebracht einige Bemerkungen zu machen. 

Tatsächlich ist ein gutes Urteilsvermögen und wahrscheinlich auch eine persönliche Empfehlung geboten, wenn es um Menschen geht, die von sich behaupten "die Akasha Chronik lesen" zu können. 

Oftmals wird gechannelt, und nicht in der Akasha Chronik gelesen !

Es wird empfohlen den "Therapeuten" oder den "Heiler" zu fragen wie er oder sie sicher stellen kann, dass es sich beim Gesagten tatsächlich um Informationen aus der Akasha Chronik handelt, und nicht um gechannelte Informationen.

Fühlst du dich wohl bei der Antwort, resoniert es mit dir, dann folge deiner inneren Stimme, deiner Führung. 

Hast du Zweifel, dann laß es. 

Letztendlich müssen für zurerst lernen unserem eigenen Herzen zu vertrauen, uns selbst, und den Informationen die wir bekommen, wenn wir mit unserem eigenen Herzen verbunden sind. 

Es ist aus diesem Interview nicht zu erkennen, ob Gabrielle Orr den Unterschied zwischen Akasha Chronik und Channeling kennt. Entscheidet selbst. 

Es gibt keine Authorität, ausser dich Selbst. In Liebe.